Blog Entertainment Environment Latest News News Analysis Opinion Sports World
Of Woes And Men: Women’s Autonomy Is A Myth Just Ask Britney Spears

Britney Spears has been mocked, derided by the media. She has no autonomy over the money she earned herself and now has also revealed that she cannot choose what to do with her reproductive system. For 13 years now, Spears has been under the control of a “conservatorship” of her father, James P. Spears. In 2007, she had a public meltdown due to several drug-fuelled experiences. 


 


Family Law Self Help Centre defines guardianship as:


 


“If someone can’t make critical decisions for themself, a judge appoints someone — called the “conservator” — to make those decisions for her. Decisions made by the conservator have the legal backing of the court. The conservator might be appointed to decide about her finances, medical and personal care, or both”.


 


It should be noted that conservatorship or adult guardianship is reserved solely for those incapable of making their own decisions or those in a flailing medical state.


Paparazzi invaded her private space. She was followed everywhere. Stories were made and published based on false reports by a psychologist.


She was painted as a crazy woman. 


 


These are a few words she has used to describe the conservatorship in an online hearing today: “traumatized”, “plea” “denial”, "want my life back”, “abusive.”  


 


While the World empathizes with her dilemma, spawning several decades and a “Free Britney” hashtag, the press and even her family have attempted to control her autonomy, shamed her terribly, and have soured public opinion over decades.


 


Even before her meltdown in 2007, Spears was a soft target for all tabloids, gossip magazines, and even mainstream “high brow” newspapers. In the magazines, every detail from her hair and her maternal instincts to the reasons for her split with her ex-boyfriend were examined under a microscopic male gaze.


 


Here’s a Brief Timeline of the events that shaped her future:


 




  • 2006: She filed for divorce from ex Kevin Federline




  • 2006-2008: Ugly custody battles followed




  • 2008: The conservatorship was approved and put in place




  • 2014: A New York Times report stated that she was in denial and worried about being taken advantage of




  • 2016: She spoke to an investigator about how she earned all the money but did not get to spend it. She requested termination of guardianship.




  • 2019: She went on an indefinite hiatus from music to look after her family




  • April 2019: A podcast claimed that Britney was being held against her will and caused an uproar on social media




  • February 2021: “Framing Britney Spears,” a documentary by NY Times released with bombshell claims




  • June 2021: She speaks up for herself in a virtual court.




 


Women won the right to drive very recently. They are still struggling to gain autonomy over their reproductive rights. 


Here is the case of a megastar (with assets valued over 60 million$) who has no right to drive by herself, spend her own money or even take control of her body.


 


The press has also accepted its role in the damage it caused her reputation. They framed her as someone who is not in control of her actions. She has also been questioned based on her sexuality, morality, and motherhood.


 


While the press accepting its mistake is the first step in compensation. Do you think that’s enough?


Would the same treatment be accepted if Britney Spears were a man?


 


Tags: Women News Framing Women's Rights Male Gaze Free Britney Entertainment Press


Similar articles

Priya Malik wins Gold at World Cadet Wrestling Championship

Pregnant women of Madhya Pradesh will now become Bahubali

Stop Inhumanity, Stop The Brutality


0 comments

Leave a comment


You need to login to leave a comment. Log-in