Blog Business Entertainment Environment Health Latest News News Analysis Opinion Science Sports Technology World
Pegasus panel seeks public opinion on surveillance and privacy invasion

The Supreme Court appointed a technical committee to probe into the alleged use of Israeli spyware Pegasus for snooping. The Supreme Court has sought more time to submit its final report. The Supreme Court has sought comments on 11 questions from the public until March 31. The questions include whether the boundaries of state surveillance are well-defined or not, and what should be the recourse mechanism in the event of a complaint if someone is under targeted surveillance.


 


In October, the court set up the committee to look into allegations of snooping phones of activists, politicians, lawyers, and journalists. The probe was ordered in response to petitions filed by activists and persons whose phones were affected, which highlighted the breach of the right to privacy and was sold to the government and their agencies. The form also included questions on what substantive and procedural safeguards-involving administrative, judicial, or could the authorities suggest that individual rights are sufficiently balanced with the interests of national security and public order?


 


The panel headed by retired Supreme Court judge Justice RV Raveendran was formed to look into certain matters relating to the complaint. The remaining members of the court-appointed committee include Naveen Kumar Chaudhary (professor of Cybersecurity and Digital Forensics and Dean of Gandhinagar National University of Forensic Sciences in Gujarat); Prabaharan P, Professor (School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kerala) and Ashwin Anil Gumaste (institute chair and associate professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology IIT Bombay).



The Supreme Court earlier refused to allow the central government to form the probe committee and formed the committee itself for more influence and biased free reports. Petitions were filed by advocate M.L. Sharma, CPI-M MP John Brittas, journalist N. Ram, Jagdeep Chokkar (former IIM professor), Narendra Mishra, Paranjoy Guha Thakurta (journalist), Rupesh Kumar Singh, S.N.M. Abdi, and Editors Guild of India who demanded an independent probe.


Share This Post On

Tags: #India #Pegasus #Supremecourt #Indiannews #Petitions #Latestnews #Righttoprivacy #Journalists #Privacy #centralgovernment #Surveillance #Control



0 comments

Leave a comment


You need to login to leave a comment. Log-in
TheSocialTalks was founded in 2020 as an alternative to mainstream media which is fraught with misinformation, disinformation and propaganda. We have a strong dedication to publishing authentic news that abides by the principles and ethics of journalism. We are a not-for-profit organisation driven by a passion for truth and justice in society.

Our team of journalists and editors from all over the world work relentlessly to deliver real stories affecting our society. To keep our operations running, we depend on support in the form of donations. Kindly spare a minute to donate to support our writers and our cause. Your financial support goes a long way in running our operations and publishing real news and stories about issues affecting us. It also helps us to expand our organisation, making our news accessible to more everyone and deepening our impact on the media.

Support fearless and fair journalism today.


Related