Blog Business Entertainment Environment Health Latest News Lifestyle News Analysis Opinion Science Sports Technology Videos World
The U.S. Supreme Court denies Derek Chauvin’s appeal for the George Floyd murder case

U.S.


November 22, 2023


Ainsley King


 


The U.S. Supreme Court denies Derek Chauvin’s appeal for the George Floyd murder case


 


On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider Derek Chauvin’s appeal. He was convicted for George Floyd’s murder during an arrest in 2020, which set off massive demonstrations against racism and police violence. Chauvin filed an appeal after a Minnesota appellate court maintained his 2021 murder conviction, but Chauvin’s plea for a new trial was dismissed. Chauvin had claimed that the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution denied him the right to a fair trial due to juror bias and specific decisions made by the presiding judge.


 


“Mr. Chauvin’s case shows the profound difficulties trial courts have to ensure a criminal defendant’s right to an impartial jury consistently when extreme cases arise,” his attorney wrote to the A.P. In addition, Chauvin requested that the justices reconsider his conviction and decide whether the trial judge had to convene a hearing to address claims of juror misconduct that came to light after the verdict was rendered. As the city awaited the judgment, Chauvin mentioned concerns about riots in Minneapolis. He contended that the jurors had a personal stake in finding Chauvin guilty to prevent threats of violence against their families and the town.


 


Chauvin, a white police officer, was incarcerated for 22 and a half years after killing Floyd, a Black man, by kneeling on his handcuffed neck for more than nine minutes during an arrest. Floyd’s murder brought attention to the problem of racial injustice and sparked protests in other American and international locations. Chauvin, was found guilty in April 2021 by a 12-member jury on three counts of second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and manslaughter after a three-week trial during which 45 witnesses—including eyewitnesses, police officers, and medical professionals—gave testimony.


 


 The guilty decision was a strike to law enforcement’s treatment of African Americans and a turning point in the contentious history of race relations in the United States. Onlookers caught the altercation on camera on May 25, 2020, when Chauvin, now 47, and three other police officers were trying to apprehend Floyd, 46, for allegedly using a counterfeit $20 money to purchase cigarettes at a grocery store. After a struggle, Chauvin put his knee into Floyd’s neck.


 


Without legal representation, Chauvin submitted the request for a new autopsy whilst incarcerated at a federal prison in Arizona. He claims that Topeka, Kansas-based physician William Schaetzel has informed him that he believes Floyd’s death was not due to hypoxia from Chauvin’s actions but rather to complications from a rare tumor known as a paraganglioma, which can result in a lethal adrenaline rush. The pathologist looked over the autopsy reports but did not inspect Floyd’s body. 


 


“I can’t go to my grave with what I know,” Schaetzel told The Associated Press on Monday, explaining why he reached out to Chauvin. He went on to say, “I just want the truth.” 


Chauvin further claims that Schaetzel contacted Eric Nelson, his trial lawyer, in 2021 regarding the state-court murder trial, the judge, and the prosecution. Still, Nelson withheld information about the pathologist and his concepts from Chauvin. Additionally, he claims Nelson did not contest the federal charge’s constitutionality.


 


Nelson declined to comment on Monday. However, Chauvin argues in his motion that, had the jury heard the pathologist’s testimony, they would not have found him guilty.


Share This Post On

Tags: Supreme Court Police USA case 2020 Law 2023 BLM



0 comments

Leave a comment


You need to login to leave a comment. Log-in
Thesocialtalks.com is a Global Media House Initiative by Socialnetic Infotainment Private Limited.

TheSocialTalks was founded in 2020 as an alternative to mainstream media which is fraught with misinformation, disinformation and propaganda. We have a strong dedication to publishing authentic news that abides by the principles and ethics of journalism. We are an organisation driven by a passion for truth and justice in society.

Our team of journalists and editors from all over the world work relentlessly to deliver real stories affecting our society. To keep our operations running, We need sponsors and subscribers to our news portal. Kindly sponsor or subscribe to make it possible for us to give free access to our portal and it will help writers and our cause. It will go a long way in running our operations and publishing real news and stories about issues affecting us.

Your contributions help us to expand our organisation, making our news accessible to more everyone and deepening our impact on the media.

Support fearless and fair journalism today.


Related