Blog Business Entertainment Environment Health Latest News News Analysis Opinion Science Sports Technology World
Today’s Supreme Court Blurs The Separation of Church and State

This week, activists all over the country marched in protest of the Supreme Court’s decision to revoke women’s abortion rights. The ruling revealed an underlying controversy that permeates many other recent cases: the government’s endorsement of Christianity. 


 


On Friday, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court voted 6-3 to uphold Mississippi’s law banning abortions after 15 weeks. The ruling overturned the precedent set in 1973 by Roe v. Wade regarding the right to terminate a pregnancy.


 


The six conservative justices that ruled in favor of upholding the Mississippi ban reflect a concerning ideology that the government should impose a religious and moral vision, given that the arguments against abortion rights stem from Christian beliefs.


 


Those six justices are all current or former members of the Federalist Society, an organization created in 1982 to promote conservative-minded judges who impose Christian ideologies on the American public. 


 


A majority far-right, Christian judiciary means that many federal court rulings reflect a preferred religious affiliation. Last week, the Supreme Court struck down a Maine law that excluded religious schools from a state tuition program. The decision forces the state to fund religious schools regardless of their discriminatory practices. 


 


On Monday, the court ruled that a public high school’s football coach had a right to lead his team in prayer after games. The dissenting judges argued that students had felt coerced to participate in the religious activity despite not sharing their coach’s beliefs. 


 


The decision opposed the Supreme Court’s rejection of prayer in public schools over the last 60 years. As recent as 2000, the court ruled that student-led organized prayer at football games violated the First Amendment’s prohibition of government-endorsed religion. 


 


Monday’s decision also disavowed the long-established Lemon test, which the court used to determine whether a government action had a secular purpose. Any activity that did not pass the test would be prohibited. 


 


Today’s court said that a history-only approach would be used in place of the old method. However, the court did not specify the new historical test it would implement for such cases. 


 


The Supreme Court’s far-right rulings over the past month have reflected a religious endorsement in the face of long-standing policies that separate church and state.


Share This Post On

Tags: Religion Supreme Court Abortion Roe v. Wade



0 comments

Leave a comment


You need to login to leave a comment. Log-in
TheSocialTalks was founded in 2020 as an alternative to mainstream media which is fraught with misinformation, disinformation and propaganda. We have a strong dedication to publishing authentic news that abides by the principles and ethics of journalism. We are a not-for-profit organisation driven by a passion for truth and justice in society.

Our team of journalists and editors from all over the world work relentlessly to deliver real stories affecting our society. To keep our operations running, we depend on support in the form of donations. Kindly spare a minute to donate to support our writers and our cause. Your financial support goes a long way in running our operations and publishing real news and stories about issues affecting us. It also helps us to expand our organisation, making our news accessible to more everyone and deepening our impact on the media.

Support fearless and fair journalism today.


Related