Blog Business Entertainment Environment Health Latest News News Analysis Opinion Science Sports Technology World
The Analysis of “Why National Identity Matters"

Francis Fukuyama’s article, Why National Identity Matters,” examines national identities’ causes and consequences. It also scrutinizes the concept of immigration and nations. Namely, Fukuyama’s opinions about national identities’ advantages or formation and the concept of nation or immigrants will be evaluated in the following response essay


Left-wing parties’ main programs about the rights of minorities and economic equality. In contrast, right-wing parties’ programs include patriotism and national identity. Nowadays, economical equalities are a critical problem that affects many people and states. Despite this situation, people are still standing thanks to the politics of resentment. This resentment is used by many countries such as Russia and China. Moreover, modern parties use to identify politics. This term means identity-based policy, so the concept of identity is very significant.


National identity has quietly important for modern states. National identity includes laws, formal language, and cultural values. Nowadays, diversity such as gender and religion is part of national identity. Diversity has a very advantage. For example, it provides a strong immunity, but it has a disadvantage in causing civil war in some countries. Besides, national identity is based on laws or institutions and collective historical memory. However, some people define national identity as a wrong term in the modern world due to racism. Despite these opinions, national identities can be built on liberal and democratic political values and around the shared experiences that provide the connective tissue allowing diverse communities to thrive. The presence of national identities is related to six rules: The first is physical security. If countries do not have national identities, they collapse easily.


Secondly is the quality of government because there is a correlation between bad government and corruption. Thirdly, national identity is related to high GDP because people who have a national identity work proudly for their countries. Fourth, national identities build trust. People, groups, and communities trust each other. Fifth, national identities reduce economic inequality because everyone in the country sees each other as the same family member, and they help each other. The final function is liberal democracy because it allows the government to protect the rights of its citizens. Nowadays, the number of immigrants in the world has increased. In some countries, the number of immigrants exceeded the number of locals. However, some populist politicians are uncomfortable with this situation. They say their country is for their own citizens only, and they say immigrants go back to their country. At this point, new questions arise about citizenship and nation identity: What exactly do these concepts mean? Some radical right-wing parties say that these concepts are related to hereditary. Other people assert that the idea of a nation does not belong to the 21st century, so they want to be part global cosmopolitan society. Another view is that human rights and equality are essential. Thus, countries should intervene in each other’s internal affairs and be more sensitive to refugees when it comes to such issues.


The writer asserts that national identity is quite essential because national identity allows countries to be stronger and more prosperous than other countries. However, in the 16th century, Iran and Turkey had good economies. Donald Quataert’s 2005 book,  The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922, notes that these two countries have struggled with many problems because national identity is not alone enough for a country to be solid or prosperous. Thus, country location is a significant factor. Turkey and Iran were surrounded by powerful states. These powerful states occupied and controlled Iran’s and Turkey’s land.


These countries are experiencing difficulties because they were occupied at that time. Moreover, the writer thinks that China is significantly developed due to having a strong national identity, and liberal democracy and solid national identity correlate. Nevertheless, China is governed by oligarchic party dictatorships. This government does not have factors related to national identity. For example, China does not treat its citizens equally, especially in the Tibetan and Uyghur regions are very poor. Also, Chinese people do not trust each other because the government eliminates opposition as soon as it hears the slightest criticism about Chinese politicians.


Furthermore, the article’s third part includes immigrants’ problems. Some governments, mainly right-wing, are against immigrants, and they say that this country belongs to us. At that point, the writer examines the concept of nations and nation-states. Namely, who decides the borders of the country? For example, Quebec’s citizens speak French, but the rest of the country speaks English. In this case, will those people become Canadian citizens because anti-refugees are uncomfortable with immigrants because they cannot express their own language? Then, it is necessary to determine what makes a nation a nation. Ernest Renan, What is a Nation? Adds that there are many opinions on this subject. Still, most importantly, it argues that “a nation is, therefore, a large-scale solidarity, constituted by the feeling of the sacrifices that one has made in the past and of those that one is prepared to make in the future.” For example. Karamanlides lived a very long time in Anadolu with Muslim Turks. In 1923 they had to Greece due to the 1923 population exchange between Greece and Turkey. According to The Nation and its sermons: Islam, Kemalism and the Presidency of religious affairs in Turkey, Although they have the same religion as Greek people and use the Greek alphabet too, these people struggled with many problems in Greece. Namely, religion or language does not create nations.


In a Nutshell, national identity is a pivotal factor for a strong country, but it alone is not enough. The opinion is that every weak country does not have to have a national identity. The concept of national identity is based on many factors. In addition, the writer questions the idea of nation and comments on the concept of nation logically. Also, he organized the text very well and wrote in a fluent language. 


image source:https://www.historytoday.com/archive/british-national-identity


 


 


Share This Post On

Tags: #Identity #Iran #China #Culture #Turkey #Nation



0 comments

Leave a comment


You need to login to leave a comment. Log-in
Thesocialtalks.com is a Global Media House Initiative by Socialnetic Infotainment Private Limited.

TheSocialTalks was founded in 2020 as an alternative to mainstream media which is fraught with misinformation, disinformation and propaganda. We have a strong dedication to publishing authentic news that abides by the principles and ethics of journalism. We are an organisation driven by a passion for truth and justice in society.

Our team of journalists and editors from all over the world work relentlessly to deliver real stories affecting our society. To keep our operations running, We need sponsors and subscribers to our news portal. Kindly sponsor or subscribe to make it possible for us to give free access to our portal and it will help writers and our cause. It will go a long way in running our operations and publishing real news and stories about issues affecting us.

Your contributions help us to expand our organisation, making our news accessible to more everyone and deepening our impact on the media.

Support fearless and fair journalism today.


Related