Photo Courtesy of Carpe Daily
The movement of clothing companies toward sustainable fashion means that prospects for sustainability are now taken into consideration when deciding whether or not to support certain businesses. While fast fashion is criticized for its unethical production practices, consumers are shifting their purchases to well-known small business firms that support sustainability.
Consumer studies reveal, as reported in a recent Forbes article, that customers favor retail companies with sustainability as a key component of their mission statements, and this trend is continuing to be seen in consumers' purchasing decisions.
Fast fashion represents brands that customers all around the world are acquainted with, making it a strong adversary of sustainable retail. Fast fashion generates profits in spite of problems ranging from inadequate working conditions for factory workers to an increase in textile waste, along with lower pricing and a wide range of products created for sale.
Many fast fashion companies are accused of "greenwashing," or promoting more environmentally friendly production methods in order to seem like an eco-friendly company without having transparent evidence of their full transition to sustainability. This causes confusion among consumers. According to earth.org, well-known companies like H&M and Zara made ambiguous claims in their sustainability reports, and while their eco-friendly lines make a commendable attempt, they fall short of achieving full sustainability. As long as these companies continue to promote "sustainable" at a low cost and are not clear about their actual missions, this deception could develop into misinformation.
The quality and personable element are two ways that quick fashion and more eco-friendly firms differ from the other. Fast fashion firms are notorious for creating enormous amounts of cheap clothing, with the inferior quality reflecting that, and it can be challenging to identify the face or person behind them.
On the other hand, eco-friendly businesses work to highlight well-known companies that pay more attention to the kinds of materials that go into their products, such as recycled cotton and polyester to cut down on waste. They also feature small business owners who, despite having a smaller retail selection, pay close attention to the specifics of each of their items for both their clients and the environment.
Consumers may turn to alternative sources to learn more about sustainability in companies and assess if brands are indeed sustainable in order to change the tide for sustainable shopping. One website called Good On You was established in Australia with the primary goal of giving consumers more in-depth knowledge and information about sustainable retail brands. According to Good On You, fashion labels are rated on a scale of "Great" to "We Avoid" based on the brands' commitments to people, the environment, and even animals as well as their data openness. Customers can access these internet resources to make better and informed selections about not just what they buy but also who they buy it from.
As a result of placing sustainability first among their business priorities as a retailer, several businesses are garnering attention in the media. Patagonia and Pact are two of the better-known ones, but there are also more recent brands like Girlfriend Collective and Knickey. These lesser-known brands might not be as commercialized or might not be sold by well-known retailers like Nordstrom. However, as these brands are able to launch their eco-friendly endeavors from the beginning, they symbolize the possibility for the retail future to further promote small businesses and sustainability, as the two become more connected.
Share This Post On
Leave a comment
You need to login to leave a comment. Log-in